Model assessment · Komperdell

Komperdell Carbon EVO Zero Comp Trekking Pole review

Three-section telescoping carbon/Titanal.HF pole with Powerlock 3.0 lever adjustment from 90–120 cm and a listed 57 cm packed length.

Sources checked 2026-10-31 · Our editorial approach

Review the exact model, limitations and buying checks on BuyerShortlists before choosing a seller. We may earn from qualifying purchases.

Two Komperdell Carbon EVO Zero Comp poles with red-brown foam grips, dark shafts, lever locks and a 57 cm packed-length schematic against white.
Official Komperdell image for Carbon EVO Zero Comp K1752390-10-Tele; pictured components do not establish package contents. Komperdell manufacturer image
A useful fit for

A documented candidate when the required working setting is within 90–120 cm, a 57 cm listed pole length suits the real storage route, and a telescoping external lever is appropriate. The grip is described as foam but is not classified as EVA or cork.

The main tradeoff

The listed maximum is 120 cm; the standard Carbon EVO Zero instead reaches 140 cm but is 67 cm packed. The 193 g figure has no stated pole-versus-pair basis, and a seller's item count, full package and snow-basket inclusion remain unconfirmed.

Your needs, this model

Does it fit your priorities?

Does the compact EVO reach a 120 cm setting?

The exact K1752390-10-Tele page lists 90–120 cm adjustment, so 120 cm is its documented endpoint. A required setting above that value is outside this configuration's listed range.

Explore this need in the finder →
How does its packed length compare with the standard EVO?

The Comp page lists 57 cm, compared with 67 cm for standard Carbon EVO Zero. That makes it the shorter listed pole dimension, not a guarantee that it clears a particular pack opening; the compact version also has a lower maximum setting.

Explore this need in the finder →
Are its grip material and winter basket contents confirmed?

The product page calls the grip Trek 150 foam and the 2027 article calls it Trek Foam Comfort, without identifying EVA or cork. The page describes a changeable Vario basket and the catalogue lists Mini UL Vario, but a snow basket in a particular retailer package is not confirmed.

Explore this need in the finder →

This source-based assessment concerns the exact Komperdell U.S. Carbon EVO Zero Comp K1752390-10-Tele. It is not a hands-on review. The manufacturer page lists a 90–120 cm working range, 57 cm packed length and 193 g weight figure. The matched Trekbook repeats those values, but neither source states whether the listed weight is for one pole or a pair. Do not treat it as a confirmed carried weight for a pair.

Komperdell Carbon EVO Zero Comp poles with dark shafts, red-brown foam grips and lever locks; the official image also shows a 57 cm dimension graphic.
Official image associated with K1752390-10-Tele. It includes a dimension illustration and depicts two poles; neither establishes the contents or quantity of a seller's offer.

The compact range trades away the standard model's reach

The Comp configuration is listed from 90 to 120 cm and at 57 cm packed. Standard Carbon EVO Zero is a different exact product number with a 105–140 cm range and a 67 cm packed dimension. The Comp therefore begins 15 cm lower and has a shorter maximum by 20 cm, while its listed packed length is 10 cm shorter. That distinction can matter more than the family name: a buyer checking a required setting above 120 cm should not assume that the Comp can extend to the standard model's endpoint. Conversely, extra reach has little value if it is not needed and the shorter pole is easier to stow.

Check the intended hand position on level ground and on the slope where you expect to change pole length. Body height alone does not supply the answer. The 57 cm value is a pole dimension, not a measurement of the opening, fabric sleeve or loaded compartment. Measure the route in and out of the pack and leave room for the handle, tip and strap instead of treating a 57 cm cavity as a guarantee.

A telescoping hybrid shaft with external-lever adjustment

The page describes three sections: carbon upper and middle tubes of 18 and 16 mm, then a 14 mm Titanal.HF lower section. Powerlock 3.0 is the length-adjustment lever. This is a telescoping design, not a Z-pole that folds into shorter segments joined by a cord. That difference describes the setup, not a ranking: the page does not independently measure lock holding force, stiffness, impact response or service life. Its use instructions warn against going beyond the maximum mark and say to store the telescoping poles with the lock in its non-fixed position. They also advise cleaning and drying after use and avoiding lubricants on or in the shaft and lock.

Grip and basket terms require careful reading

The exact product page names a Trek 150 foam grip and Comfort Padded strap. Article 175 23 90-10 in the 2027 Trekbook calls the grip Trek Foam Comfort. The terms differ, and neither source says the foam is EVA or cork. A shopper filtering for a specific grip material should leave this model out of that explicit material category unless a more precise source is found. These labels also do not predict comfort for an individual hand.

Komperdell describes a changeable Vario basket system on the product page. The catalogue lists a Mini UL Vario basket and Flex carbide tip for the article. Neither source is a complete retailer packing list, so the evidence does not establish seller quantity, a storage bag, exact supplied tips or a snow basket in the package. The photo is not proof of what ships. If a winter basket is a hard requirement, get the exact answer for K1752390-10-Tele from the seller rather than inferring inclusion from the ability to change baskets.

Do not substitute the similarly named Carbon Pro or Ultra Comp

Carbon EVO Zero Comp and Carbon Pro Zero Comp have different product numbers and specifications. The Carbon Pro Zero Comp is also compact, but its page lists a 90–120 cm span and 57 cm packed length with a Trek Pro 280 Foam grip and extended grip zone; the EVO Comp page names Trek 150 foam and does not document that extended zone. The Pro variant's 201 g listing is not this model's 193 g figure, and neither mass basis is specified. Carbon Ultra Zero Comp is different again: its source identifies a carbon lower section and explicit cork grip wording. These details are not transferable just because each name contains “Zero Comp.”

Decision checks before choosing

The EVO Zero Comp is a documented candidate when your actual required setting lies within 90–120 cm, a 57 cm listed pole dimension suits your measured storage route, and you want a telescoping pole with an external lever. It is not a universal short-hiker fit, nor does its compact label establish comfort or ease of carrying. Verify the exact K1752390-10-Tele product number, confirm the supplied quantity and the basket/tip contents of the seller's offer, and use the current instructions for setup and care. The evidence supports a comparison of published boundaries; it does not establish fit, availability or field performance.

Komperdell U.S. Carbon EVO Zero Comp product page (K1752390-10-Tele; checked 2026-10-31). The matched 2027 Trekbook identifies article 175 23 90-10.

Key specifications

Key details at a glance

Minimum usable length90 cm
Maximum usable length120 cm
Collapsed length57 cm
Manufacturer-listed weight (basis shown in product notes)193 g
Published weight entries (mapping or basis may be unclear)193 g
Adjustable working lengthYes
Shaft materialCarbon upper and middle sections with a titanal.hf lower section
Adjustment lockExternal lever clamp
Shaft sections3
Included basketsMini UL Vario basket
Available usable-length ranges90–120 cm
Published weight entries (mapping or basis may be unclear)193 g
Shaft storage designTelescoping

Use the exact model’s instructions for operating limits, supplied equipment and version differences.

Sources for this review

Sources for this assessment

Build a shortlist around your pole-length and trail needs.

The finder compares only documented settings and supplied features. Unknown details are not treated as a match.

In this review

Questions to consider for this model

Read the matching requirement, its tradeoffs and the other reviewed options.

More matching requirements
Combine my requirements →